MAST

PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW:
The opportunity titled "MAST" involves the procurement of services or products related to the Department of Defense, specifically under the Navy's NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support at Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. The core objective is to fulfill the operational needs of the Navy, although specific details regarding the project scope and objectives are not provided in the metadata. Bidders should refer to the linked description for comprehensive project details.

ISSUING ORGANIZATION:
The issuing organization is the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support, located in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, USA. The primary contact for this opportunity is Scott R. Youngblood, who can be reached at 717-605-2379 or via email at [email protected].

KEY DATES:

• Posted Date: August 5, 2026
• Proposal Due Date: September 4, 2026, at 20:30
• Anticipated Award Date: Not specified
• Performance Period: Not specified

CONTRACT DETAILS:
The type of contract is not explicitly mentioned in the metadata. Additionally, there is no information provided regarding the estimated contract value or budget range, nor are there any details about option years.

MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS:
Bidders must meet the following mandatory requirements to be considered eligible:

• Required certifications and registrations: Registration in SAM.gov is mandatory.
• Required security clearances: Not specified in the metadata.
• Set-aside restrictions: Not specified.
• Geographic restrictions: Not mentioned.
• Minimum years of experience or past performance requirements: Not specified.
• Bonding or insurance requirements: Not mentioned.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES:
Specific technical skills, technologies, or methodologies required are not detailed in the metadata. Bidders should refer to the project description for any technical requirements that may be outlined.

DELIVERABLES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:
Key deliverables, milestones, reporting requirements, and performance metrics are not specified in the metadata. Bidders are encouraged to review the linked description for any outlined expectations.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:
The evaluation criteria for proposals are not detailed in the metadata. Bidders should look for information regarding the weighting of factors such as technical approach, past performance, and price in the project description.

PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS:
Preferred qualifications that may enhance a bidder's competitiveness are not explicitly stated in the metadata. Bidders should consider any additional certifications, experience, or capabilities that could be advantageous when reviewing the project description.

In summary, while the metadata provides essential contact and timeline information, bidders are encouraged to consult the linked project description for comprehensive details regarding the project scope, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria to fully assess their fit for this opportunity.