Pearson e-book

PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW:
The Department of Defense, specifically the Army's Mission Installation Contracting Command (MICC) at Fort Drum, is seeking proposals for the procurement of Pearson e-books. The core need is to provide educational resources in digital format that can be utilized by Army personnel, enhancing their learning and training capabilities. The project aims to ensure access to high-quality educational materials that align with the Army's training objectives.

ISSUING ORGANIZATION:
The issuing organization is the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, AMC, ACC, Mission Installation Contracting Command, 419th CSB, located in Fort Drum, NY, USA. The primary contact for this opportunity is Violet Roberts, who can be reached at [email protected].

KEY DATES:

• Posted Date: August 4, 2026
• Proposal Due Date: August 11, 2026
• Anticipated Award Date: Not specified
• Performance Period: Not specified

CONTRACT DETAILS:
The contract type has not been explicitly stated in the provided information. Additionally, there is no mention of the estimated contract value or budget range, nor any option years.

MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS:
Bidders must meet the following mandatory requirements to be considered eligible:

• Registration in SAM.gov is required.
• There are no specific security clearances mentioned.
• No set-aside restrictions (such as 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB) are indicated.
• No geographic restrictions or place-of-performance requirements are specified.
• Minimum years of experience or past performance requirements are not detailed.
• Bonding or insurance requirements are not mentioned.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES:
While specific technical skills or methodologies are not outlined, bidders should possess expertise in providing digital educational resources, particularly in the context of e-books. Familiarity with Pearson's digital platforms and content may be advantageous.

DELIVERABLES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:
The key deliverables include the provision of Pearson e-books. However, specific milestones, reporting requirements, and performance metrics are not provided in the available information.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:
The evaluation criteria for proposals have not been explicitly detailed. It is unclear how proposals will be assessed, including the weighting of factors such as technical approach, past performance, and price. The nature of the evaluation (best-value or lowest-price technically acceptable) is also not specified.

PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS:
Preferred qualifications are not explicitly mentioned, but bidders with experience in educational resource provision, particularly in military or defense contexts, may have a competitive advantage. Familiarity with Pearson products and services could also enhance a bidder’s proposal.

In summary, potential bidders should focus on their ability to provide Pearson e-books and demonstrate relevant experience in educational resource provision, while ensuring compliance with mandatory requirements such as SAM registration.